PAXG vs XAUT: Which Tokenized Gold Product Fits Your Use Case?

PAXG and XAUT are the two dominant tokenized gold products on the market. Both represent one troy ounce of physical gold stored in professional vaults, and both trade as ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum. But the similarities end there — the issuers, regulatory frameworks, vault locations, and redemption mechanics differ in ways that matter for different types of investors.

This comparison breaks down what each product offers and where each one fits.

Issuer and Regulatory Structure

PAXG is issued by Paxos Trust Company, a New York-regulated financial institution supervised by the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS). Paxos holds a limited-purpose trust charter, which means it operates under banking-level regulatory oversight. Customer assets are held separately from corporate assets, and Paxos publishes monthly attestation reports from an independent accounting firm.

XAUT is issued by TG Commodities Limited, an entity associated with the Tether group. TG Commodities is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. While Tether has taken steps to increase transparency in recent years, including quarterly attestations, it does not operate under the same regulatory framework as a US-chartered trust company.

Bottom line: If regulatory clarity and US-level oversight matter to you, PAXG has the stronger position. If you are comfortable with offshore issuers and prioritize ecosystem breadth, XAUT works.

Gold Custody and Backing

Both products are backed by allocated London Good Delivery gold bars — the institutional standard. “Allocated” means each token holder has a claim on specific, identified bars rather than a share of a pooled reserve.

PAXG gold is stored at Brink’s vaults in London. Holders can look up the serial number, refiner, and weight of the specific bars backing their tokens through the Paxos website.

XAUT gold is stored in Swiss vaults. Tether Gold also provides per-token bar lookup, allowing holders to verify which bars back their position.

Both products maintain a 1:1 ratio between tokens in circulation and ounces of gold in custody. The practical difference is jurisdiction: London vaults for PAXG, Swiss vaults for XAUT. Some investors prefer Swiss jurisdiction for its long history of gold custody.

Blockchain and Network

PAXG exists only on Ethereum as an ERC-20 token. This makes it compatible with the entire Ethereum DeFi ecosystem — lending protocols, decentralized exchanges, and yield-generating strategies.

XAUT is available on both Ethereum (ERC-20) and Tron (TRC-20). The Tron version offers lower transaction fees, which can matter for frequent or small-value transfers. However, Tron has a smaller DeFi ecosystem than Ethereum.

If you plan to use tokenized gold in DeFi, PAXG’s Ethereum-only approach is not a limitation — Ethereum is where the action is. If you want cheaper transfers and do not need DeFi, XAUT on Tron could save on gas fees.

Liquidity and Trading Venues

PAXG trades on Kraken, Binance, Coinbase, and several other major exchanges. It also has meaningful liquidity on Uniswap and other Ethereum DEXes. Daily trading volume typically ranges from $5M to $20M.

XAUT trades primarily on Bitfinex, with additional listings on smaller exchanges. Its DEX liquidity is thinner than PAXG’s. Daily trading volume is generally comparable to PAXG but concentrated on fewer venues.

For most investors, both products offer sufficient liquidity. But if you value exchange diversity and DEX depth, PAXG has the edge.

Fees

Fee Type	PAXG	XAUT
Custody fee	None	None
On-chain transfer	0.02% of transfer value	None (standard gas only)
Creation fee	Varies by size	0.25%
Redemption fee	Varies by size	0.25%

PAXG charges a small fee on every on-chain transfer (not on exchange trades). XAUT does not charge transfer fees beyond Ethereum or Tron gas costs. For frequent on-chain movers, XAUT has a slight fee advantage. For buy-and-hold investors, the difference is negligible.

Redemption for Physical Gold

Both products allow redemption for physical gold, but the process and minimums differ:

PAXG: Minimum redemption is one London Good Delivery bar (approximately 430 troy ounces, worth roughly $1.9M at current prices). Smaller holders sell tokens on exchanges instead.

XAUT: Physical redemption is available in Switzerland. Minimums are similar — redemption is practical only for institutional-sized positions.

For the vast majority of retail investors, redemption for physical gold is not realistic with either product. The primary exit is selling tokens on an exchange for cash or crypto.

Who Should Choose What

Choose PAXG if you:

Value US-regulated custody and transparent attestation
Plan to use tokenized gold in Ethereum DeFi
Want broad exchange availability including Coinbase
Prefer London vault jurisdiction

Choose XAUT if you:

Prefer Swiss vault jurisdiction
Want lower transfer fees using Tron
Are comfortable with offshore issuer structure
Trade primarily on Bitfinex

For most investors starting out: PAXG is the safer default because of its regulatory clarity, attestation transparency, and broader exchange support. XAUT is a reasonable alternative for investors who have specific reasons to prefer Swiss custody or Tron-based transfers.

The Decision Framework

The PAXG vs XAUT choice ultimately comes down to two questions:

How much does regulatory oversight matter to you? If a lot, PAXG wins clearly.
Which blockchain ecosystem do you live in? Ethereum-heavy users will find PAXG more useful; Tron users may prefer XAUT.

Both products achieve the core mission — giving you gold exposure on a blockchain with physical backing. The differences are in the wrappers, not the gold itself.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I switch between PAXG and XAUT? Yes. You can sell one on an exchange and buy the other. There is no direct swap mechanism between the two tokens, but any major exchange that lists both makes the conversion straightforward.

Are these tokens safe from hacks? The tokens themselves are simple ERC-20 contracts that have been audited. The greater risk is exchange-level security (if you hold on an exchange) or wallet security (if you self-custody). Use hardware wallets for significant positions.

Which has better price tracking? Both track gold spot price closely. Minor deviations can occur during low-liquidity periods, but arbitrageurs typically keep the price within a few dollars of spot on both tokens.